Battle of Stoke Field 16 June 1487

Posted: June 16, 2010 in Stoke

Battle of Stoke marker

The one member of the Yorkist royal family who had come through the Wars relatively unscathed, her husband and sons alive and her own long life still with nearly twenty years to run, was Elizabeth duchess of Suffolk. This can partly be put down to her husband, John de la Pole’s, political disinterest, pragmatism and lack of military competence and zeal. As a family, the Suffolks seemed very much to prefer a quiet life of domestic peace.

Her oldest son, John earl of Lincoln, had fought at Bosworth and been pardoned. He ostensibly made his peace with Henry Tudor, but he never quite made his peace with the end of Yorkist rule or the decline of his own political fortunes.

In 1487, a ten year old boy known to us as Lambert Simnel was brought to Lincoln’s attention. He is said to have had a striking resemblance to the duke of York and at first it was planned to pass him off as young Edward V. When it was clear that that wouldn’t work, plans changed and he was launched on the world as Edward earl of Warwick, son of the duke and duchess of Clarence. The real Warwick was in the Tower at the time, but a story about his escape wasn’t difficult to piece together and present to both diehard Yorkists looking for a figurehead and a public as eager for stories of drama and adventure as people are today.

Margaret duchess of Burgundy, always happy to have an opportunity to challenge Henry Tudor and avenge the death of her brother Richard III and the fall of the House of York, supported Lincoln when he brought the boy to Burgundy. She gave him 2,000 Flemish mercenaries and her financial support.

On 4 May, Lincoln and Simnel landed in Dublin and set about recruiting Irish mercenaries. Simnel was crowned Edward VI on 24 May. Lincoln’s army then set sail, landing in Lancashire on 4 June, joined by this time by (amongst others) Francis Lovell.

The 8,000 strong army marched 200 miles in 5 days. Scrope of Bolton, another chancer (who had supported Richard Nevill earl of Warwick in both his Yorkist and Lancastrian incarnations), joined them and led a raid against Clifford near Bramham Moor. It was a heartening victory for the Yorkists.

Held up by three days of skirmishes in Sherwood Forest, Lincoln’s army soon lost the numerical advantage as George Stanley lord Strange was able to use the time to gather reinforcements.

The armies met near the banks of the Trent, Tudor’s forces led by the earl of Oxford. In a fiercely fought three hour battle, the lightly armoured Irish mercenaries bore the brunt and were cut down. All the Yorkist leaders fell in battle except Lovell, who escaped across the Trent and disappeared. His final fate is a mystery. Around 4,000 ‘rebels’ were slain and at least 3,000 of Oxford’s men. Most of the dead, including the earl of Lincoln, were buried on the battlefield.

Simnel was captured after the battle, pardoned and given a job in the royal kitchens.

Lincoln’s death didn’t end the de la Pole’s political activities. Two brothers, who clearly didn’t inherit their parents’ love of the quiet life, presented themselves as heads of the House of York. Edmund (1471-1513), originally allowed to succeed to the Suffolk dukedom but later reduced to an earl, went in search of backing from the Holy Roman Emperor. When his son, Philip of Burgundy, ended up unexpectedly in England after being blown off course, he bought his freedom with the promise to hand over the earl of Suffolk, on the proviso that his life would be spared. In 1513, with Henry VIII now on the throne, that arrangement no longer applied and Suffolk was beheaded.

The youngest brother, Richard, also styling himself head of the House of York, died in 1525 at the battle of Pavia.

Elizabeth duchess of Suffolk died in 1503, her husband in either 1491 or 92. They must have grieved greatly for their oldest son John, but were spared the loss of both Edmund and Richard.

The Battle of Stoke effectively ended all hopes of a Yorkist revival.

  1. Caroline says:

    Thank you for another interesting post! Your blog, along with Medieval Woman and The Yorkist Age, has helped keep my interest in the WOTR alive.I thought it was interesting that you mentioned the fate of Frances Lovell- after he fled the battle, wasn't he issued a safe conduct pass by the King of Scotland? I've always been skeptical of the story where he supposedly starved to death at Minster Lovell. I think it's more likely he fled to Burgundy or France if he survived- and it behooved him to remain anonymous.

  2. Ragged Staff says:

    caroline, thanks, i endorse your comments on mw and ya, and had not thought myself quite on their par, so i appreciate that enormously.i haven't delved into the lovell story too deeply yet and all i know is the vague stuff everyone knows, but i don't believe the skeleton story either.what i really need to discover are the forgotten fitzhugh letters,please excuse the lc- it's irritating but temporary.

  3. I am puzzled by the decision to put up a pretend Warwick when Warwick was known to be in the Tower. Just seems like bad plotting. I also wonder about the associated downfall of Elizabeth Woodville/Wydeville. I just cannot see that lady getting involved in a plot to depose her own daughter in order to put Warwick – George Clarence’s son! – on the throne.

    It has been suggested that Edward V (no less) was the real pretender, that he was killed in the fighting and a false boy substituted by Henry. But there are snags with that version too, not least why the pretender was crowned Edward VI rather than Edward V.

    As so often in this era, we seem to be putting together a 1000 piece jigsaw with 500 pieces missing!

    • anevillfeast says:

      We’re talking about the nation that believed Edward IV’s “I’m just here to reclaim my dukedom. Don’t worry about me! Just get on with your work, you won’t even notice I’m here.”
      I’m going to have to do a lot more research on just about everything post ’85, Brian. I’ll no doubt revisit this battle some time in the future when my knowledge and understanding is clearer. As you say – it’s a difficult jigsaw indeed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s